Physics / mechanism
A PDK is the formal interface between a semiconductor fab’s process and a designer’s EDA toolchain. It packages design rules (DRC), layer definitions, SPICE models (BSIM, PSP, Verilog-A), parameterised cell libraries (pcells), and extraction decks (LVS/RCX) into a versioned artifact. When a designer draws a gate, the PDK defines minimum poly pitch, gate-oxide capacitance, threshold voltage corners (TT/FF/SS/SF/FS), and parasitic RC budgets. Modern advanced-node PDKs (TSMC N3, Intel 18A, GF 22FDX) contain millions of DRC rules; photonic PDKs (imec iSiPP50G, GF Fotonix, AIM Photonics) add waveguide loss coefficients, coupling gap tolerances, and S-parameter compact models. PDK maturity is a primary proxy for process maturity—tape-out yield tracks PDK revision count closely.
Competitive landscape
Open-source PDKs (SkyWater SKY130, GF 180MCU, IHP SG13G2) have disrupted the traditional NDA-gated model, lowering university and startup entry costs. Competing abstraction layers include DTCO flows (design-technology co-optimisation, blurs PDK boundaries at 3 nm and below) and chiplet/UCIe interface specs that partially decouple die-level design rules from package integration. Cloud-native EDA (Cadence JedAI, Synopsys.ai) is pushing PDK consumption toward API-based rather than file-based delivery.
PDK vs MPW, and what the customer actually does
A recurring confusion in foundry-layer deals: the PDK and the MPW are orthogonal, not sequential stages of one thing.
- A PDK is what you design with. A software rulebook plus a characterised parts catalogue. It is the design-time interface.
- An MPW is how you get a design fabricated cheaply for the first time. A cost-sharing logistics model. It is the manufacturing-time service.
You design with the PDK, then fabricate via an MPW (prototype), and later via a dedicated wafer run (volume). The PDK does not change between MPW and dedicated; what changes is whether you share the wafer or own it. A foundry offering MPW access necessarily publishes a PDK first, because nothing can go on a shuttle that was not designed against the process rules.
| PDK | MPW shuttle | Dedicated run | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Design rulebook + parts library (software) | Shared-wafer prototype service | Own-wafer production service |
| Customer action | Designs a process-legal layout | Submits a finished layout to a slot | Commits to own masks + full wafers |
| Gets back | A GDS layout | A few–dozen prototype dies | Thousands of production dies |
| They are doing | Engineering / design | Validation / debug | Manufacturing |
| Cost | Licence (often free to qualified designers) | Per-area slot (~$50K–500K) | Full mask + wafers ($500K–5M+) |
The chip-company → foundry transition (the load-bearing insight)
- Making your own chip work needs an internal PDK (your design team, your process).
- Letting strangers design on your process needs a third-party-grade PDK: documented, supported, with DRC decks, characterised components, MPW shuttle scheduling, and yield commitments.
The second is a multi-year, customer-facing engineering build that is categorically different from the first, and it serves a different buyer: the foundry-phase customer is a fabless photonics design team bringing their own designs, not the component buyer (e.g. a transceiver vendor) who purchases a finished chip. This is why Tower Semiconductor pulled the chip→foundry transition off (foundry DNA, productised PDK) while most photonic-chip peers stayed chip companies. “Our modulator works” does not imply “outsiders can design on our line.” The external-PDK roadmap is both the moat and the most underestimated line item in the round.
Companies using
Connected ideas
Sources
Frontier (open questions)
- To be added.