Data infrastructure
Durable value in the AI data stack accrues to whoever owns the WRITE path and the data gravity — storage, governance, pipelines, streaming, observability — not the read/retrieval path; retrieval commoditises into Postgres extensions and model-API context windows while lakehouse…
- Bear
- Closing
- $505B by 2035
The callAgents need a governed place to write and prove their work, but Databricks and Snowflake are building it; the route is public markets, not a startup.
- D1Fleets of AI agents reading, writing and acting on company data all day need lineage, memory and governance that warehouses built for analysts do not track.
- D2EU AI Act lineage and governance duties put dated regulatory spend on the write path.
- R1Incumbents hold the data and ship every new sub-layer as a bolt-on, so the residue a startup can own shrinks toward the retrieval sliver.
- R2The write-path view is the published consensus, with vector databases still the fastest-growing category, so the view is no longer early or different.
- R3The startup-reachable market fell from $22B to about $9B when checked, and the 2035 share depends on 2020-21 companies compounding at 50% for a decade on undisclosed revenue.
- C1The EU AI Act's Annex III high-risk duties become enforceable, putting lineage and governance spend on the write path.2 Dec 2027
- 1Whether a standalone vector database still grows above 30% with expanding margins while long-context adoption rises; if so, this view was wrong.Mar 2027 · open
- 2AI Act high-risk duties in force and the governance spend that follows.Dec 2027 · open
- 3By end-2027 value in the AI data stack concentrates in the WRITE path while standalone vector/retrieval erodes.Dec 2027 · open
- 4Databricks' IPO, the public-markets route into the write path.Dec 2027 · open
- DDOGDatadog
- cheap
- IBMIBM
- full
- MDBMongoDB
- expensive
- SNOWSnowflake
- expensive
- AMZNAmazon Web Services
- fair
- MSFTMicrosoft
- full
- ORCLOracle
- not screened
- GOOGLGoogle Cloud
- cheap
Private · 14 private companies, 10 of them in the US; none in continental Europe.
ElectricSQL (Electric DB Limited) · Xorq (LETSQL Inc.) · Embucket, Inc. · Bruin Data Limited · ClickHouse · Supabase · dbt Labs · Neon · Pinecone · Airbyte · ElectricSQL · Embucket · Bruin · Xorq
$2.8B raised by 10 companies, $1.3B of it in the last three years. Wave under way: Large rounds in the last three years; the category is funded and getting crowded.
Backed by a top-tier venture firm: ClickHouse, Supabase, dbt Labs, Airbyte, Pinecone, Neon, ElectricSQL. Backed by a strategic investor: Supabase, dbt Labs, Airbyte, ElectricSQL.
- $1BClickHouse
- Founded 2021
- $1BSupabase
- Founded 2020
- $410Mdbt Labs
- Founded 2016
- $181MAirbyte
- Founded 2020
- $138MPinecone
- Founded 2019
- $104MNeon
- Founded 2021
- ·ElectricSQL
- Founded 2021
- ·Embucket Pre-Seed
2 more funded companies in the market.
- 26 Jul 2026The write-path call became the crowded trade while I was still calling it contrarian.