Theses›Consumer devices›AR optics test and metrology
AR optics test and metrology
As display glasses scale, every waveguide needs an inline image-quality test (eyebox, MTF, uniformity, colour) and every waveguide wafer needs grating and flatness metrology.
- Bear
- Early
- $1.2B by 2035
The callAbout $420M a year of AR/VR display test kit, and the display-metrology incumbents already sell production waveguide testers.
- D1Display glasses grow from about 3M units in 2026 to 12M (IDC) or 32M (TrendForce) by 2030, and every waveguide needs an eyebox test.
- D2Waveguide makers are adding lines in several countries (Schott Malaysia, Quanta, Crystal-Optech, Goertek's 12-inch fab), and each new line buys test.
- D3Eyebox scanning is slow by the literature's own account, so throughput is a real buying criterion.
- R1The market is small: about $420M a year in total and about $60M for production waveguide test.
- R2Incumbents already ship production testers (Trioptics takt under 1.5 s) and own the customer qualifications.
- R3Capacity runs ahead of demand: Lumus partners can make over 6M waveguides a year against 1-3M glasses, so test capex lags units.
- R4One buyer dominates: Meta is 69% of smart glasses, and the big waveguide makers build some metrology in-house.
- C1A second display-glasses platform (Apple display glasses or a Google/Samsung Android XR display model) ships at scale and pushes the market toward TrendForce's 32M units.2028-29
What would prove itdated tests, open and resolved
- 1Display-glasses units against the two forecasts: IDC's 12M by 2030 or TrendForce's 32M.Dec 2027 · open
- ·Any waveguide maker naming test throughput as its line limit, and Trioptics or Konica Minolta production wins.
Expressionslisted, private, technologies
What changedthe record, newest first
- 23 Oct 2026Testing the waveguides in smart glasses is a real production step, but it is a few hundred million dollars a year and the display-metrology incumbents already sell the kit.