Physics / mechanism
Transformer-based large language models dominate current AI: attention mechanisms scale as O(n²) in sequence length, mitigated by sparse attention, flash attention, and MoE routing. Training runs now exceed 10²³–10²⁴ FLOPs; inference is the cost-dominant phase at scale. Key parameters: model size (1B–1T+ parameters), context window (128k–1M tokens), quantisation precision (FP8/INT4 for edge), and memory bandwidth (HBM3e at ~1.2 TB/s). SotA: GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, Llama 3, Mistral. The bottleneck has shifted from algorithms to silicon—compute density, memory bandwidth, and interconnect (NVLink, UCIe, CXL) now determine competitive position.
Competitive landscape
The primary axis of competition is silicon architecture: GPU (NVIDIA H100/B200) vs. purpose-built AI accelerators (Groq, Cerebras, Tenstorrent, SambaNova) vs. in-memory compute and neuromorphic (Intel Loihi, IBM NorthPole). Photonic inference accelerators (Lightmatter, Luminous) attack the bandwidth wall via optical interconnect. At the algorithm layer, SSMs (Mamba) challenge transformers on long-context efficiency. Edge AI competes on power envelope: sub-10W inference on NPUs (Apple ANE, Qualcomm Hexagon).
| Axis | GPU (NVIDIA) | AI ASIC | Photonic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput | High | Very high (narrow workload) | Bandwidth-limited currently |
| Power efficiency | Moderate | High | Potentially transformative |
| Flexibility | High | Low | Low |
Companies using
Connected ideas
Sources
Frontier (open questions)
- To be added.